rigid.ink ABS Filament, 1.75 mm, 1 kg (2.2 lbs), Blue

Print material overall rating

Sold via Amazon
$43.95
Buy
See all test results See all pictures


Comments:

The rigid ink material it has the settings which almost for all abs materials, and by adjusting the normal quality setting the print becomes out in good quality !

Color: Blue

Here at rigid.ink we know how hard it is to find a reliable supplier of filament, so we decided to make our own and even
use laser testing. We're not just interested in supplying outstanding quality filament either; we're hot on excellent customer service.

That means fast delivery, hassle free returns and a personal service with a smile. In the unlikely event
there's anything you don't like about your order, just let us know. We'll bend over backwards to help you out.


Why buy rigid.ink?
• We make all our own filament
• We only use the best machinery and raw materials
• Our tolerances are an astoundingly low +/- 0.03mm
• Highest quality at an affordable price
• We honour a 60 day money back guarantee and are the only ones in the industry to do so (as far as we know)

What we offer?
• Sample packs for you to test our original colours
• 33ft/16ft (10m/5m) lengths of all our colours and materials
• 2.2lbs (1KG) reels for the ones you use most

How to use?
• Printing temperature 455-491°F
• Use a heated bed to avoid warping
• Heated bed temperature 176-230°F
• Cover print bed in polyimide tape (e.g. Kapton or PET) to prevent sticking

Colours?
• Our colours are true to our images and have excellent pigmentation
• We are continuously working on new exciting colours and materials
• Get in touch if there's a colour you don't see

We also have sample packs available of our 8 original colours on Amazon and on our website (www.rigid.ink) available in 1.75mm and 2.85mm
Check out our sample packs here: http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0105WU2O6/ref=biss_dp_sa1

Our colours are accurately represented, and we're working on more.

Our filament is strong and durable, made using the finest raw materials.

Won't jam your prints, with very specific tolerances of just 0.03mm.

No bubbles or nasty surprises, supplied with desiccant (just in case).

Made using the finest machinery, excellent quality is assured.

Material Properties
Printing Properties
Submitted on 04 August 2016 Mass Portal Pharaoh

Printing take

Technical parameters/specification
3d printer used:
Mass Portal Pharaoh
Nozzle diameter (mm)
0.4mm
Layer thickness (mm)
0.2mm
Printing speed (mm/s)
50mm/s
Travel speed/rate (mm/s)
150mm/s
Retraction (mm/s)
50mm/s
Retraction distance (mm)
2mm/s
Extruder temperature (Co)
250
Platform temperature (Co)
110
Cooling (On/Off)
On
Platform type
BuildTalk
Brim (yes/no)
Yes
Raft (yes/no)
Yes
Adhesion enhancers used
None
Slicer used
CraftWare
Infill %
20
Number of shells
3
Visual evaluation
Photos of printed material
Evaluate the degree of part’s separation from printing platform 1- completely separated; 5- part did not get separated
Evaluate the part’s warp from the platform
Evaluate the degree of warp in other sections of the part 1- part does not match the blueprint; 5- warp was not observed
Quality of ship deck and bridge roof 1- surface is not closed, unsatisfactory; 5- perfectly closed surface
Quality of ship sides and bridge walls 1- surfaces are not even, unsatisfactory; 5- perfectly even surfaces
Quality of ship’s bottom surface –not taking into account warp 1 – surface is not closed, unsatisfactory; 5 – perfectly closed surface
Presence of unnecessary artifacts on the surface – hanging threads, artifacts, cavities 1 – many artifacts on the surface; 5 – perfectly clean surface – no artifacts
Round back window diameter measuring mm vertically
8.73
Number of threads in back window that have sagged loose approximate number
0
Overall quality of back window 1 – unsatisfactory; 5 – successful with minimum sagging threads
Front window height measuring mm vertically
8.5
Number of threads in front window that have sagged loose approximate number
0
Overall quality of front window 1 – unsatisfactory; 5 – successful with minimal sagging threads
Overall ship length
60.60
Overall quality of ship railing 1-unsatisfactory; 5 – successful
Overall ship height
48
Overall quality of box behind the cabin 1- unsatisfactory; 5 – successful
Chimney outside diameter
6.90
Chimney side straightness 1- not straight with significant curve; 5 – completely straight wall
Chimney overall quality 1- unsatisfactory; 5-successful
Roof overhang quality 1- unsatisfactory; 5-successful
Cylinder shape surface quality 1 – surface is not filled, unsatisfactory; 5 – surface completely filled
Inscription on nameplate at the back of the ship 1-inscription not readable, poorly parted ; 5 – inscription completely readable
Quality of the logo on the bottom surface of ship 1 – logo not clear and not recognizable; 5 logo successful and perfectly recognizable
Evaluation of overall print quality 1 – unsatisfactory; 5 – successful
Technical parameters/specification
3d printer used:
Mass Portal Pharaoh
Nozzle diameter (mm)
0.4mm
Layer thickness (mm)
0.2mm
Printing speed (mm/s)
60mm/s
Travel speed/rate (mm/s)
150mm/s
Retraction (mm/s)
50mm/s
Retraction distance (mm)
2mm/s
Extruder temperature (Co)
250
Platform temperature (Co)
110
Cooling (On/Off)
On
Platform type
BuildTalk
Brim (yes/no)
Yes
Raft (yes/no)
Yes
Adhesion enhancers used
None
Slicer used
CraftWare
Infill %
20
Number of shells
3
Visual evaluation
Photos of printed material
Evaluate the degree of part’s separation from printing platform 1- completely separated; 5- part did not get separated
Evaluate the part’s warp from the platform
Evaluate the degree of warp in other sections of the part 1- part does not match the blueprint; 5- warp was not observed
Quality of ship deck and bridge roof 1- surface is not closed, unsatisfactory; 5- perfectly closed surface
Quality of ship sides and bridge walls 1- surfaces are not even, unsatisfactory; 5- perfectly even surfaces
Quality of ship’s bottom surface –not taking into account warp 1 – surface is not closed, unsatisfactory; 5 – perfectly closed surface
Presence of unnecessary artifacts on the surface – hanging threads, artifacts, cavities 1 – many artifacts on the surface; 5 – perfectly clean surface – no artifacts
Round back window diameter measuring mm vertically
8.53
Number of threads in back window that have sagged loose approximate number
1
Overall quality of back window 1 – unsatisfactory; 5 – successful with minimum sagging threads
Front window height measuring mm vertically
8.24
Number of threads in front window that have sagged loose approximate number
1
Overall quality of front window 1 – unsatisfactory; 5 – successful with minimal sagging threads
Overall ship length
61.50
Overall quality of ship railing 1-unsatisfactory; 5 – successful
Overall ship height
48
Overall quality of box behind the cabin 1- unsatisfactory; 5 – successful
Chimney outside diameter
6.90
Chimney side straightness 1- not straight with significant curve; 5 – completely straight wall
Chimney overall quality 1- unsatisfactory; 5-successful
Roof overhang quality 1- unsatisfactory; 5-successful
Cylinder shape surface quality 1 – surface is not filled, unsatisfactory; 5 – surface completely filled
Inscription on nameplate at the back of the ship 1-inscription not readable, poorly parted ; 5 – inscription completely readable
Quality of the logo on the bottom surface of ship 1 – logo not clear and not recognizable; 5 logo successful and perfectly recognizable
Evaluation of overall print quality 1 – unsatisfactory; 5 – successful
Technical parameters/specification
3d printer used:
Mass Portal Pharaoh
Nozzle diameter (mm)
0.4mm
Layer thickness (mm)
0.2mm
Printing speed (mm/s)
40mm/s
Travel speed/rate (mm/s)
150mm/s
Retraction (mm/s)
50mm/s
Retraction distance (mm)
2mm/s
Extruder temperature (Co)
245
Platform temperature (Co)
110
Cooling (On/Off)
On
Platform type
BuildTalk
Brim (yes/no)
Yes
Raft (yes/no)
Yes
Adhesion enhancers used
None
Slicer used
CraftWare
Infill %
20
Number of shells
3
Visual evaluation
Photos of printed material
Evaluate the degree of part’s separation from printing platform 1- completely separated; 5- part did not get separated
Evaluate the part’s warp from the platform
Evaluate the degree of warp in other sections of the part 1- part does not match the blueprint; 5- warp was not observed
Quality of ship deck and bridge roof 1- surface is not closed, unsatisfactory; 5- perfectly closed surface
Quality of ship sides and bridge walls 1- surfaces are not even, unsatisfactory; 5- perfectly even surfaces
Quality of ship’s bottom surface –not taking into account warp 1 – surface is not closed, unsatisfactory; 5 – perfectly closed surface
Presence of unnecessary artifacts on the surface – hanging threads, artifacts, cavities 1 – many artifacts on the surface; 5 – perfectly clean surface – no artifacts
Round back window diameter measuring mm vertically
8.75
Number of threads in back window that have sagged loose approximate number
0
Overall quality of back window 1 – unsatisfactory; 5 – successful with minimum sagging threads
Front window height measuring mm vertically
8.76
Number of threads in front window that have sagged loose approximate number
0
Overall quality of front window 1 – unsatisfactory; 5 – successful with minimal sagging threads
Overall ship length
61
Overall quality of ship railing 1-unsatisfactory; 5 – successful
Overall ship height
48
Overall quality of box behind the cabin 1- unsatisfactory; 5 – successful
Chimney outside diameter
6.73
Chimney side straightness 1- not straight with significant curve; 5 – completely straight wall
Chimney overall quality 1- unsatisfactory; 5-successful
Roof overhang quality 1- unsatisfactory; 5-successful
Cylinder shape surface quality 1 – surface is not filled, unsatisfactory; 5 – surface completely filled
Inscription on nameplate at the back of the ship 1-inscription not readable, poorly parted ; 5 – inscription completely readable
Quality of the logo on the bottom surface of ship 1 – logo not clear and not recognizable; 5 logo successful and perfectly recognizable
Evaluation of overall print quality 1 – unsatisfactory; 5 – successful
Evaluation of material characteristics
Please evaluate how was working with this material compared with other materials 1 - very hard, 5 – considerably easier
Which of the technical parameters had the biggest influence on material printing quality?
Printing speed and temperature
To what extent printing speed influenced printing quality? 1- speed had considerable influence on quality; 5- speed had no influence on quality
Please name what you believe are the 3 most evident characteristics of this material tough, fragile, elastic, solid, soft, other – name them
Tough, Solid, Inelastic
Describe material smell during the printing process
No smell during the print
Describe material surface characteristics by physically feeling and evaluating the part.
Soft and with smooth texture.
How easy is this material to polish (with sandpaper, file or other)? 1- very hard, 5- easy
Please note what tool was used for polish test?
Sanpaper
Can this material be glued? (Yes/No)
Yes
If yes, please note what sort of solvent, glue was used?
Notes
The material itself is really good, and it has a nice adjustable setting that you can see if you change them in extreme way, you will see the difference, the print quality is all about the settings.
Submitted on 04 August 2016 FlashForge Creator Pro

Printing take

Technical parameters/specification
3d printer used:
FlashForge Creator Pro
Nozzle diameter (mm)
0.4mm
Layer thickness (mm)
0.2mm
Printing speed (mm/s)
50mm/s
Travel speed/rate (mm/s)
150mm/s
Retraction (mm/s)
50mm/s
Retraction distance (mm)
2mm/s
Extruder temperature (Co)
245
Platform temperature (Co)
100
Cooling (On/Off)
On
Platform type
BuildTalk
Brim (yes/no)
Yes
Raft (yes/no)
Yes
Adhesion enhancers used
None
Slicer used
Simplify 3D
Infill %
20
Number of shells
3
Visual evaluation
Photos of printed material
Evaluate the degree of part’s separation from printing platform 1- completely separated; 5- part did not get separated
Evaluate the part’s warp from the platform
Evaluate the degree of warp in other sections of the part 1- part does not match the blueprint; 5- warp was not observed
Quality of ship deck and bridge roof 1- surface is not closed, unsatisfactory; 5- perfectly closed surface
Quality of ship sides and bridge walls 1- surfaces are not even, unsatisfactory; 5- perfectly even surfaces
Quality of ship’s bottom surface –not taking into account warp 1 – surface is not closed, unsatisfactory; 5 – perfectly closed surface
Presence of unnecessary artifacts on the surface – hanging threads, artifacts, cavities 1 – many artifacts on the surface; 5 – perfectly clean surface – no artifacts
Round back window diameter measuring mm vertically
9
Number of threads in back window that have sagged loose approximate number
0
Overall quality of back window 1 – unsatisfactory; 5 – successful with minimum sagging threads
Front window height measuring mm vertically
9.4
Number of threads in front window that have sagged loose approximate number
0
Overall quality of front window 1 – unsatisfactory; 5 – successful with minimal sagging threads
Overall ship length
60.60
Overall quality of ship railing 1-unsatisfactory; 5 – successful
Overall ship height
48
Overall quality of box behind the cabin 1- unsatisfactory; 5 – successful
Chimney outside diameter
6.9
Chimney side straightness 1- not straight with significant curve; 5 – completely straight wall
Chimney overall quality 1- unsatisfactory; 5-successful
Roof overhang quality 1- unsatisfactory; 5-successful
Cylinder shape surface quality 1 – surface is not filled, unsatisfactory; 5 – surface completely filled
Inscription on nameplate at the back of the ship 1-inscription not readable, poorly parted ; 5 – inscription completely readable
Quality of the logo on the bottom surface of ship 1 – logo not clear and not recognizable; 5 logo successful and perfectly recognizable
Evaluation of overall print quality 1 – unsatisfactory; 5 – successful
Technical parameters/specification
3d printer used:
FlashForge Creator Pro
Nozzle diameter (mm)
0.4mm
Layer thickness (mm)
0.2mm
Printing speed (mm/s)
60mm/s
Travel speed/rate (mm/s)
150mm/s
Retraction (mm/s)
50mm/s
Retraction distance (mm)
2mm/s
Extruder temperature (Co)
250
Platform temperature (Co)
100
Cooling (On/Off)
On
Platform type
BuildTalk
Brim (yes/no)
Yes
Raft (yes/no)
Yes
Adhesion enhancers used
None
Slicer used
Simplify 3D
Infill %
20
Number of shells
3
Visual evaluation
Photos of printed material
Evaluate the degree of part’s separation from printing platform 1- completely separated; 5- part did not get separated
Evaluate the part’s warp from the platform
Evaluate the degree of warp in other sections of the part 1- part does not match the blueprint; 5- warp was not observed
Quality of ship deck and bridge roof 1- surface is not closed, unsatisfactory; 5- perfectly closed surface
Quality of ship sides and bridge walls 1- surfaces are not even, unsatisfactory; 5- perfectly even surfaces
Quality of ship’s bottom surface –not taking into account warp 1 – surface is not closed, unsatisfactory; 5 – perfectly closed surface
Presence of unnecessary artifacts on the surface – hanging threads, artifacts, cavities 1 – many artifacts on the surface; 5 – perfectly clean surface – no artifacts
Round back window diameter measuring mm vertically
9
Number of threads in back window that have sagged loose approximate number
0
Overall quality of back window 1 – unsatisfactory; 5 – successful with minimum sagging threads
Front window height measuring mm vertically
9.5
Number of threads in front window that have sagged loose approximate number
0
Overall quality of front window 1 – unsatisfactory; 5 – successful with minimal sagging threads
Overall ship length
60.90
Overall quality of ship railing 1-unsatisfactory; 5 – successful
Overall ship height
48
Overall quality of box behind the cabin 1- unsatisfactory; 5 – successful
Chimney outside diameter
6.60
Chimney side straightness 1- not straight with significant curve; 5 – completely straight wall
Chimney overall quality 1- unsatisfactory; 5-successful
Roof overhang quality 1- unsatisfactory; 5-successful
Cylinder shape surface quality 1 – surface is not filled, unsatisfactory; 5 – surface completely filled
Inscription on nameplate at the back of the ship 1-inscription not readable, poorly parted ; 5 – inscription completely readable
Quality of the logo on the bottom surface of ship 1 – logo not clear and not recognizable; 5 logo successful and perfectly recognizable
Evaluation of overall print quality 1 – unsatisfactory; 5 – successful
Technical parameters/specification
3d printer used:
FlashForge Creator Pro
Nozzle diameter (mm)
0.4mm
Layer thickness (mm)
0.2mm
Printing speed (mm/s)
60mm/s
Travel speed/rate (mm/s)
150mm/s
Retraction (mm/s)
50mm/s
Retraction distance (mm)
2mm/s
Extruder temperature (Co)
245
Platform temperature (Co)
100
Cooling (On/Off)
On
Platform type
BuildTalk
Brim (yes/no)
Yes
Raft (yes/no)
Yes
Adhesion enhancers used
None
Slicer used
Simplify 3D
Infill %
20
Number of shells
3
Visual evaluation
Photos of printed material
Evaluate the degree of part’s separation from printing platform 1- completely separated; 5- part did not get separated
Evaluate the part’s warp from the platform
Evaluate the degree of warp in other sections of the part 1- part does not match the blueprint; 5- warp was not observed
Quality of ship deck and bridge roof 1- surface is not closed, unsatisfactory; 5- perfectly closed surface
Quality of ship sides and bridge walls 1- surfaces are not even, unsatisfactory; 5- perfectly even surfaces
Quality of ship’s bottom surface –not taking into account warp 1 – surface is not closed, unsatisfactory; 5 – perfectly closed surface
Presence of unnecessary artifacts on the surface – hanging threads, artifacts, cavities 1 – many artifacts on the surface; 5 – perfectly clean surface – no artifacts
Round back window diameter measuring mm vertically
9
Number of threads in back window that have sagged loose approximate number
0
Overall quality of back window 1 – unsatisfactory; 5 – successful with minimum sagging threads
Front window height measuring mm vertically
9.5
Number of threads in front window that have sagged loose approximate number
0
Overall quality of front window 1 – unsatisfactory; 5 – successful with minimal sagging threads
Overall ship length
60.2
Overall quality of ship railing 1-unsatisfactory; 5 – successful
Overall ship height
48
Overall quality of box behind the cabin 1- unsatisfactory; 5 – successful
Chimney outside diameter
7
Chimney side straightness 1- not straight with significant curve; 5 – completely straight wall
Chimney overall quality 1- unsatisfactory; 5-successful
Roof overhang quality 1- unsatisfactory; 5-successful
Cylinder shape surface quality 1 – surface is not filled, unsatisfactory; 5 – surface completely filled
Inscription on nameplate at the back of the ship 1-inscription not readable, poorly parted ; 5 – inscription completely readable
Quality of the logo on the bottom surface of ship 1 – logo not clear and not recognizable; 5 logo successful and perfectly recognizable
Evaluation of overall print quality 1 – unsatisfactory; 5 – successful
Evaluation of material characteristics
Please evaluate how was working with this material compared with other materials 1 - very hard, 5 – considerably easier
Which of the technical parameters had the biggest influence on material printing quality?
Printing speed, and temperature.
To what extent printing speed influenced printing quality? 1- speed had considerable influence on quality; 5- speed had no influence on quality
Please name what you believe are the 3 most evident characteristics of this material tough, fragile, elastic, solid, soft, other – name them
Soft, solid, tough
Describe material smell during the printing process
No smell during the print.
Describe material surface characteristics by physically feeling and evaluating the part.
It has a nice texture, and seam is good for every print, so that we can see how it is made !
How easy is this material to polish (with sandpaper, file or other)? 1- very hard, 5- easy
Please note what tool was used for polish test?
sandpaper
Can this material be glued? (Yes/No)
Yes
If yes, please note what sort of solvent, glue was used?
Notes
The rigid ink material it has the settings which almost for all abs materials, and by adjusting the normal quality setting the print becomes out in good quality !

Leave a comment